Sykes Picot Agreement Kurds


The following eleven points included the formal agreements between Great Britain, France and Russia. If we think of the last hundred years of borders drawn by a secret agreement, one wonders what the Middle East would look like today if the Sykes-Picot had been drawn differently. Share this video with the world to honor those who have been oppressed over the past 100 years and who have not had a voice. On April 21, Faisal headed east. Before leaving, on 17 April Clemenceau sent a draft letter in which the French government declared that it recognized «Syria`s right to independence in the form of a federation of autonomous governments in accordance with the traditions and wishes of the population», claiming that Fayçal had recognized «that France is called a power, Syria the necessary assistance by various advisers On 20 April , Fayçal Clemenceau assured that he was «deeply impressed by the selfless kindness of your statements while I was in Paris, and I must thank you for first proposing the sending of the Allied Commission which will soon travel to the East to identify the wishes of the local peoples regarding the future organization of their country. I am sure the Syrian people will know how to show you their gratitude. [95] QAMISHLI, Syria – The 100th state of the Sykes-Picot agreement – the agreement between the French and the British, which divided the Kurds into four countries – the Kurds of Iraq and Syria now run their own administrations in the region. However, the Kurds are now maintaining these borders by closing the only crossing point between the two Kurdistans. On 15 September, the British distributed a memory aid (which had been the subject of a private debate two days earlier between Lloyd George and Clemenceau [103]), in which the British withdrew their troops in Palestine and Mesopotamia and handed over Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo to Fayçal`s troops. While accepting the withdrawal, clemenceau continued to insist on the Sykes-Picot agreement as the basis for all discussions. [104] His foreign policy adviser, Edward House, was then informed of the agreement by the British Foreign Minister, Arthur Balfour, who, 18 months later, was to give his name to a statement that would have even more fatal consequences for the region. Prior to the centenary of Sykes-Picot in 2016, the media[109] and scientists[110] generated strong interest in the long-term effects of the agreement. The agreement is often cited as «artificial» borders in the Middle East, «without regard to ethnic or sectarian characteristics, which has led to endless conflicts.» [111] The question of the extent to which Sykes-Picot has really marked the borders of the modern Middle East is controversial.

[112] [113] The agreement was drawn up and negotiated by the country`s diplomats over the next few months and signed by the Allies between 18 August and 26 September 1917. [38] Russia was not represented in this agreement because the Tsarist regime was in the midst of a revolution. The lack of Russian approval of the Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne agreement was then used by the British at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference to invalidate it, a position that greatly outraged the Italian government. [41] The legacy of Sykes-Picot`s 1916 secret agreement, which reached its centenary amid a general chorus of denigration in the region, has never been attacked again. After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, the limits of the Sykes-Picot agreement came into force in 1920 with the Treaty of Sevres.